Saturday, July 10, 2010

Friday high/low is important

Active signal: None
Hourly trend: Up with support at 1070.77...not far below
Daily trend: Neutral since the 20dSMA was tested
Profit targets: No active signal
Trailing stop: No active signal
Last signal: Draw. Sell signal at 1030 on 7/6. 1/3 profit taken at 1019 by rule. Closed flat at 1035 on 7/7 by rule.

System Notes:
I did a rough 3-year study of instances when Dow and SPX tested their 20dSMA on different days. Usually, treating the first 20dSMA touch by either index as a test day worked well. That means even though SPX did not touch its 20dSMA until today, I am tracking Thursday as a Test Day and Friday as a Marker Day (see System Rules) which means any close beyond Friday's high/low should set the next multi-day trend. Unfortunately for bulls, in this situation, even if the trend turns up, the system will recommend heavy profit-taking at the 50dSMA and 200dSMA not far above. Still, 1-2% trade gains are possible. If the trend turns down, on the other hand, downside is much larger. Luckily, the Marker Day (1068-1078) is a tight range. So, we'll likely get a decision Mon/Tues. Any gap of >.5% as measured by SPY (since SPX does not usually show gaps well) also sets the likely new trend at this stage.

Opinions:

Hourly RSI surpassed the level achieved at SPX 1131 but daily did not confirm. Price has not overtaken 1090ish and time has not exceeded Monday yet. So, I am sticking with my preferred count for now. I see several folks are entertaining an LDT count from 1220 like me, but my alternate LDT count is different in that it still contends 1040=w1, 1131=w2 with the recent low at 1011=w3 rather than Minute [i]. That limits wave 4 upside to 1110ish but realistically no more than the 1090s. Admittedly, the bulls showed some strength this week, but they are now at more serious resistance: the 20dSMA, 1090-1110 congestion and the 50/200dSMAs just above. If my preferred count is still in play, I'd expect a reversal down by Tuesday that rapidly falls below 1000 in a week or so. If the LDT is in play, SPX is probably finishing wave A meaning 1058 or even 1040 may be challenged next week in wave B before a C wave up to 1080-1100. The bullish case could start out looking like either of those but it should hold 1040 and it should exceed 1100 with gusto. So, my preferred count will probably be solidifed or completely discarded by next weekend since it favors a rapid descent. As I mentioned today, I am cozying up to the LDT scenario and almost expecting to need to switch counts by next week. But, these strong rallies did occur many weeks during the previous bear market and my 3 main watch items (RSI, price and time) have not exceeded parameters for me to change my count, so I'm sticking to my guns and hoping the System will keep us steered in the right direction.

I updated my USD (US Dollar) chart from earier this week. Most people have recognized the negative correlation between USD and SPX for years. It has not always been that way. From my study of the monthly charts from 1982 to now, it appears that the USD generally rises best with stable interest rates, organic economic growth and commensurate monetary policy (like 1995-2001) when baby boomer spending and the technology cycle was peaking. It appears USD does worst with falling interest rates, imbalanced forced economic growth and excessive monetary interference (like 1985-1986 and 2002-2004). Although rates are historically low right now, they are "stable" and will probably be that way for a while. Although economic growth since late 2008-early 2009 has been imbalanced and forced, the government stimulus programs have nearly run their course and Stimulus III looks unlikely. Although monetary policy was extremely accommodating for the last 2 years, the Fed has closed out many of its programs, is under intense scrutiny with an audit expected and has taken its foot off the gas to see if the economy can stand on its own. So, stable rates for people to plan around, reduced monetary interference and very slow, but more organic economic growth favor a USD that grinds higher. I don't expect USD to skyrocket unless natural economic growth takes off which is nearly impossible without a major technological breakthrough since the baby boomer spending cycle, technology cycle, credit/debt cycle and oil production efficiency cycles all peaked. And, the European problems help the US Dollar, while emerging economies and China easing their yuan peg hurt the US Dollar although less than one might think since their destiny is tied greatly to the US, so that still favors grinding, upward USD action with spikes during sovereign default scares as the USD maintains some of its safehaven status.

What does that mean to SPX? Well, with a choppy, rising USD not based on strong economic growth, SPX should fall. If the Fed and govt decide to sacrifice USD with ramped up monetary interference and stimulus, SPX should get a boost, but given the bad natural prospects for economic growth which are now proven for the world to see despite all the bailouts and Stimulus programs which worked better in decades past, I don't think stocks would benefit as much next time around and the Fed probably knows it so expect some new twists. On the long-term USD charts, I noticed that SPX usually does not buy into a long-term USD trand change until a secondary support/resistance level is broken. Getting down to lower timeframes, I noticed on the USD chart since December 2009 that SPX has traded sideways during USD wave 1s and 5s. Many expected SPX weakness during such USD rallies but it has been strong as monetary policy, stimulus and economic hope were strong forces. Using the same logic to explain it, SPX rose strongly when USD fell in wave 2s and 4s. And, the only time SPX really fell was during the heart of USD wave 3s when USD was running particularly strong. See the chart.




So, the short-term charts tell me USD is about to enter a 3 of 3 up from December 2009. SPX has smelled it and has thus only traded sideways for the last month while USD dropped considerably. This plays into my 2 preferred scenarios. The first being an SPX Minor wave 3 trip down to 850-925 and the 2nd being one more lower low to complete an LDT with a 1+ month SPX bounce. If the USD wave 3 of 3 has a slow, deep wave 2 of 3 of 3 down possibly after it gets rejected by its recent high, then SPX may rally after an LDT. But, if USD breaks out, I suspect SPX will cascade down and rally in Minor wave 4 when USD decides to backtest its breakout then continue on down in wave 5 as USD completes its wave 3. If I am wrong and the USD continues much lower, then I think SPX will rally for a while until USD retests its April low.

BTW, if my USD count is right, FIBBEWIE (see Terminology) suggests USD should be going to 98+ in 6-12 months. The key level that would accelerate SPX downward is the B-wave high of 92.63 in 2005. I think USD may pause there briefly but surpass it causing the heart of SPX wave 3 down before USD backtests 92.63 and then continues up to 98-100+. Based on NOPOZO (see Terminology) attraction, I'd favor a 102.5 target or a little higher. Gold will likely drop as USD rises but gold has other linkages like fear of sovereign defaults that could soften its fall.Good luck.

12 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Liking the way you look at history. How many times has a bullish MACD div like the one now failed?

    ReplyDelete
  3. al, Looking back to 2000. For the most part MACD divergence does well for intermediate-term trading. However, I see tons of cases where there was no divergence before a top or bottom. And, I see cases where there was 1,2,3 and even 4 divergences. And, in 2003, SPX pulled back and continued to rally against 3 divergences and actually made a 4th divergence pulling back a tiny bit before blasting off in the final surge into 2004. Then, in 2004, as SPX consolidated down, SPX appeared to be making 2 divergences at a bottom like we have today but then fell in one final drop that narrowly broke the divergence but then rallied for 3 years. Also, in July 2002, MACD diverged badly when SPX fell below the 9/11/01 low at 944, but SPX merely bounced for 2.5 days after the July 4th holiday to its 20dSMA and then cascaded down 22% in 2+ weeks still maintaining a divergence. That sounds eerily similar to today except that was a 10-month divergence and there was no multi-week divergence then as we have today. So, I guess what I'm saying is that the odds favor the MACD divergence is positive intermediate-term, but there are numerous exceptions and deceptions in the last 10 years and sometimes 3 or 4 divergences can occur too and sometimes the divergence failures are big, so it's definitely not an indicator to be used alone. I'd say it does favor either the bullish count or LDT count (mine needs one more low) with low odds on a crash-like scenario, so this indicator would probably require me to flip my preferences although the reasons for cozying up to the LDT are growing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sep 1 to Dec 28 2000 reminds me a bit of today's price and MACD action. In that case, SPX rallied for 5 days, then fell hard for 2 days after touching its 20dSMA but held the bottom, then rallied hard 1 day, fell back again and rallied slowly back near the top before failing for years. That could be a model for today. SPX may form a B/2 down next week for a mere 2 days and then test 1150-1200 over 2-3 months, or SPX could make a lower low and then make the same strong rally which would fit the 2004 scenario better although that one led to 3 years of upside.

    ReplyDelete
  5. But Sept 2000 started the biggest leg of the NAS crash. I try to compare not just the pattern but where we are/were inside of a wave pattern and in our world, economics, politics, etc. if that makes sense. Hard to see a new bull mkt from here, but I am sure it was hard in 2004 too.

    Thanks for the response. I see all the divs, just can't quite make a good argument either way within the context of similar weekly and monthly chart scenarios. So to your point, too soon to conclude, could reverse next week. Check out that Dec 8t, 2008 Monday candle.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes. Dec 1st 2008 looks like a good match for this Monday. In fact, Dow hit its 20dSMA a day earlier just like this time. However, if one followed the Dow's Marker Day in that case, the system would have failed while using the SPX to set the Marker Day would have worked. That goes against the majority of cases where one index hit the 20dSMA a day earlier. So, it makes me cautious that even if SPX drops hard in the next 1-2 days, it's gonna be tricky. My system will turn down at 1070, and I've been saying 1058 and 1040 are key levels, but probably everybody is looking at the 1040 neckline and Tony mentioned 1032, so maybe SPX breaches 1040 again to get bears jumping on board and bulls capitulating only to reverse up again. Gonna be an interesting week. All the divergences and extreme oversold indicators we had at 1011-1041 certainly favor a bottom forming, so it would probably take another sovereign default scare to cause a cascade but it is possible and the weekly/monthly readings did not get very oversold at all. Using the hourly trend with a quick trigger finger is gonna be key. Time to be cautious for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  7. OK one more just for giggles. What looks to me to be like the start of 3 of 3 of 1 from the OCt 2007 high. Starting December 27th 2007. I think OEW was still indicating uptrend. Not many were looking for what was about to happen the next 14 months. GL next week and stay objective. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Here Marketrend.
    Nice stuff here. Have a nice sunday and a great week. cheers bro

    ReplyDelete
  9. liked your 10 3% plus weeks analysis on tony's. please post it here as well.
    best
    linus

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello S2: I flat in this moment.....I think you're right next target minimum 943 ...
    What happens if we break above 1131 to count??
    you can put a graphic with this hypothesis!!!
    thanks and good Sunday today .. in Tuscany 40% degrees is hot going to the sea

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, it's late at night and I had problems sharing my chart from StockCharts tonight, but I updated my weekedn post with USD analysis that aligns with my larger SPX count presented last weekend. I'll try to update one of my charts with my alternate LDT count this week, but it's not hard to visualize 1041=w1, 1131=w2, 1011=w3, 1078+=w4 (overlaps w1) and sub-1011=w5. Good luck this week.

    ReplyDelete